<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://iap2usa.wildapricot.org/page-1857028/BlogPost/4649839/RSS" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>IAP2 USA National Dialogue: P2 Crisis or Opportunity?</title>
    <link>https://iap2usa.wildapricot.org/</link>
    <description>IAP2 USA blog posts</description>
    <dc:creator>IAP2 USA</dc:creator>
    <generator>Wild Apricot - membership management software and more</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 18:16:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:32:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Colorado National Dialogue Event</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Check out the powerpoint that was used during the Colorado Chapter's National Dialogue event on October 10, 2018.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xrZOUxC_pd9T4hq9T1YmztXmmp6spqXl/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank" class="stylizedButton buttonStyle003"&gt;Click Here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>https://iap2usa.wildapricot.org/2018nationaldialogue/6736758</link>
      <guid>https://iap2usa.wildapricot.org/2018nationaldialogue/6736758</guid>
      <dc:creator />
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:10:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Perspective: Reinventing Technology Assessment</title>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;by Richard E. Sclove&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Brief Excerpt:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.71429rem; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; line-height: 1.71429; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: &amp;quot;Open Sans&amp;quot;, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="quotedText"&gt;"Technology assessment (TA) is a practice intended to enhance societal understanding of the broad implications of science and technology (S&amp;amp;T). Its use creates the possibility of preparing for or constructively influencing developments to ensure better outcomes. From 1972 to 1995, the United States led the world in institutionalizing TA. Then Congress reversed course, closing its Office of Technology Assessment (OTA).&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.71429rem; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; vertical-align: baseline; line-height: 1.71429; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: &amp;quot;Open Sans&amp;quot;, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="quotedText"&gt;Meanwhile, there are now 18 TA agencies in Europe. They have developed many promising practices, including highly effective methods involving participation by everyday citizens. &lt;STRONG&gt;Participatory technology assessment (pTA) enables laypeople who are otherwise minimally represented in S&amp;amp;T politics to develop and express informed judgments concerning complex topics.&lt;/STRONG&gt; In the process, pTA deepens the social and ethical analysis of technology, complementing the expert-analytic and stakeholder-advised approach to TA that was used by the OTA."&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Article can be found at:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://issues.org/27-1/p_sclove/" target="_blank"&gt;http://issues.org/27-1/p_sclove/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <link>https://iap2usa.wildapricot.org/2018nationaldialogue/6304500</link>
      <guid>https://iap2usa.wildapricot.org/2018nationaldialogue/6304500</guid>
      <dc:creator />
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>